Big Penis vs. The Guy Who Marries A young Girl...

No, its just weirder, see i understand 'Big Penis' was totally wrong since he had little boys fondle him and they really didn't know it, but a man who willingly takes a young 16 or whatever year old girl is sorta weird. See, in america, the problem with this is that everyone thinks you are a slave sex trafficer, and sadly its true. We judge so much and it'd kinda look weird a man kissing a 17 year old girl and taking her home and well ya know....marrying her. I feel psychologically marrying the girl is worse.

The learning environment

FREMD?! HAH, nah its cool. Our school is very hidden see, we don't show our true emotions and mask ourselves as some strange uh masked thingy's. It troubles to me to think we deny ourselves and the world when asked "are you okay?". Fremd is also a rather separated 'city'. You got the whole of classes here by the way. But we do segregated racially and by looks, the white kids, the African Americans, Asians, its basically mean girls all over again.

NEVER TEACH IT MAN

Ever since we are born we question where we come from and how it is possible of our decent. We question the balance of life in its most complex form only to realize we still don’t know all that there is. As a result we are inspired to continue our search for logical and correct answers. Scientists take years on years of pure research to find out a fraction of our evolution, but they still need more evidence to fully understand the evolution of the modern human, or us. After a given amount of time the scientist will release their information to the world for us to read and to comprehend. One of the many ways that happens is through school where by state law we are permitted to learn about evolution and all of its enriching evidence. Many people have though an issue with the idea of teaching evolution since it may come in the way of an eight letter word that has caused wars and constant feuds. That word is religion. See evolution has no spiritual involvement since science does not believe in a god, so the idea of ‘Intelligent Design’ has come into play and is being pushed into the learning environment. Intelligent design should not be taught in schools because it is very confusing, it shows little evidence of its ‘deity’, and it makes it difficult for teachers to help their students.

In a modern high school science class you would spend some time on the theory of evolution and move on since it only takes say, two weeks to really get the idea down. The reason Catholicism or Buddhism is not taught during this period is because neither of two ideas follow the laws of science. Because science includes such things as; facts, proof, tests, studies, and the list goes on and on. Religion has no place in science because it can not fit in this jigsaw puzzle. What intelligent design is the idea that evolution happened for humans, but since we are too complex there was at that point a higher power to help influence why for instance we have thumbs. It’s just the idea that we were too hard to be created by just some cells, there had to be something up there that gave us a push forward. Surprisingly religion easily will move away from science classes and such, but intelligent design seems to really want to be part of that education. And it causes problems.

The first problem of intelligent design is that it is not a science, ‘Surprisingly, President {George W.} Bush’s own official science advisor states [in August 2005] that “intelligent design is not a scientific concept’. Scientists and science educators universally agree that if something is not science, it definitely should not be taught in a high school science class.’ (Nelson). Intelligent design involves a ‘higher power’, that is religion last checked by, well anyone. It’s rather hard to prove a high power when there is no physical evidence of its own existence, which tends to be a problems when trying to prove a point. As stated in the quote scientists UNIVERSALLY( notice the uppercase letters) not accepted in the scientific community. That is almost the equivalence of saying universally North Korea is bad. It’s a hard argument to fight.

The next issue comes about when a teacher will actually try to teach a student this information. ‘How is a science teacher supposed to help students deal with the claim that any unexplained design-like features of the cell might be result of an incompetent, inconsistent and evil alien or fallen angle? (Teachers’ Dilemma). The guarantee would be this question, “What does this god or this higher power look like?” and your answer every time maybe not in these exact words will be, “Whatever you want it to be.” Science or at least educational science usually has a point proven to it so that it cannot be easily disproved. The idea that a teacher cannot fight back would usually relate to more philosophical topic, like English or Philosophy. Like said, ‘…for teachers and students would be with the nature of any intelligent designer.’ ( Teachers’ Dilemma). Another problem with teaching intelligent design is that; as soon as say a parent will hear there is a higher power involved there may be, or probably will be a lawsuit arguing if a child should learn about a higher power. Then why is Catholicism or Buddhism not involved?

A TOOL :D

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/science/18obfire.html, The idea is that a heat treated tool existed so many years ago. Strange isn't it? Fire really was not too well handled now, but think back then. A bunch of illiterate ape men running about burning stuff. IT doesn't in fact give us some rich history and such to look onto now, but I freely believe that our technology now is much better.

Sapiens man

HOMO SAPIEN IS SIGNIFCANT. Why? well because our fragile minds I believe now, are taking in so much information that it just kicks our ancestors in their butt. We everyday study at 7 hours of new materiel ads students, go back to Lucy times, they don't know what a rock is. We in our time learn so much, language, technology, anthropology it's breath taking. And Sure physically we wont change too much since were sorta set where we are as in living space and survival skills.

This is wrong sir.

Harlow was strange, see believing that taking captive monkeys and scarring them half to death to prove that monkeys can be scared doesn't really, to me, seem like any form of anthropological studies of any sort. Sorry, but no they should not be repeated on the idea that cruelty is wrong and unjust, of course back then it was acceptable to hide under a desk to protect yourself from an atomic attack. But now a days, nope.

Mr. Liarish

Obama Obama, look Mrs. C you know very well of my political views and i fully not trust the speeches presented by Mr. Barack since frankly to me he's not delivered very well. Over the poast i feel that he speaks what seems right but never truly says what can actually be done to help the nation. Words don't speak louder than actions, especially when american tax dollars are at risk.