Thursday, February 23, 2012
Intelligent Design
I believe this can go either way. The most important aspect is that it can be interpreted many ways by many different people. I can say it is a science, but then again I go turn the other direction by saying it is not a science. In school, students should be able to take their own sides, which happens in most cases. After all, it is a theory or a hypothesis so no one can be certain. In my mind, science is stuff we learn that has been proven but I can't say that any of these THEORIES are solved yet.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I agree with Jack. Because there is no proven evidence, we cannot be certain about any of these ideas. I wouldn't consider intelligent design to be a science because of this. Since there is no legitimate support, there is room for opposition. Science consists of laws that have been proven and that we can support with evidence. Intelligent design does not have clear evidence and should not be considered a science.
Post a Comment