Sunday, February 26, 2012
Intelligent Design
In my opinion, intelligent design should not be considered a form of science. And that it is fair not calling it a science, because it is simply a belief with no hard evidence to prove anything. If schools want to teach it then they can, it all depends on how the students will understand it. But schools should not teach it as a science.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I agree that it is a belief and not a science because simply, there is no evidence. I think schools have the right to teach it just not as a science.
I see your point that intelligent design is not what we are used to when we think of science: labratories, experiments, etc. But I think that it still qualifies as a science. Science is knowledge based on a systematic study. Although the researchers aren't testing chemicals in a lab, they are still getting facts based on observations.
Post a Comment